besttennisapi
Criterion 05 of 08

Can you subscribe instead of poll, and how far does it fan out?

A push transport that delivers score changes as they happen, addressable per match or across the whole slate, that holds up as the number of subscribers grows.

Why it separates providers

Polling caps your responsiveness at your poll interval and burns your quota doing it. The interesting question is not whether a WebSocket exists but how many clients it holds.

The test you can run

Subscribe to the whole slate, then open more connections and watch for dropped frames or refused connections. Check whether the transport is a real fan-out layer or a connection pinned to a worker thread.

What Live Tennis API measures

Streaming 2,000

measured August 18, 2026
concurrent subscribers, zero failures, staged at 500 / 1,000 / 2,000

Caveat. Measured against the push sidecar directly, not through the public edge. It shows the sidecar held 2,000; it does not measure the full delivery path.

Method: https://besttennisapi.com/methodology#streaming

Check it against us

A free key takes a minute and needs no card. Every criterion on this site is one you can verify against our live service, and the harness will run the same test against any other provider you are evaluating.

The other criteria

#CriterionThe question it answers
01 Latency How quickly does a scoring event reach your code?
02 Completeness What share of matches actually carry every point?
03 Tour coverage Which tours are in scope, and are they equally served?
04 Point-by-point Is there a real per-point record, and does it say where it came from?
06 Free tier Can you evaluate it properly before paying, without a card?
07 Historical depth How far back does it go, and what survives at that depth?
08 Spec and SDKs Is the contract machine-readable, and is it kept honest?